A P4P story
Since quality has many dimensions, we must worry that focusing on some dimensions will decrease our attention to other important dimensions.
The P4P debate
The con side is well done, however, it does miss a major point. Performance is too complex to summarize in measures.
More concern over P4P
P4P is no different. Please read the article. It expands on the ideas that Daniel Pink has include in his book Drive.
May physician targeted performance payment finally receive its death toll
We have made this point repeatedly for over 10 years. Yet, politicians and regulators seem enamored with “measuring quality”.
A personal reflection on 2011 – the importance of diagnosis
We can improve the teaching and practice of diagnosis. We have a growing number of physicians dedicated to this task.
I like Don Berwick, but …
Will he make his decisions based upon analyzing pilot data or as Bob Wachter brilliantly wrote 2 years ago:
More on diagnostic errors
We continue to have a health care payment system that rewards procedures – surgery, invasive cardiology, radiology, etc.
Made to stick
We should teach in layers. Make certain that the students understand basic science 101 before we work on 201.
Wisdom from Dr. Charles
I have no problem in sharing appropriate parts of my life with patients, e.g. sports teams I root for, my love for golf, a movie I saw.